Vijayawada: Supreme Court Advocate Siddhartha Luthra presented arguments on behalf of TDP Chief Chandrababu in the skill development case. He contended that there was no valid reason to apply section 409 in this case and emphasized the importance of presenting proper evidence before invoking this section. He also submitted a notice to contest the remand report, leading the judge to grant an opportunity for counterarguments. Luthra anticipated that Chandrababu might appear before the Nandyala Magistrate, but he also asserted that the government's actions were questionable in this matter. Luthra explicitly denied claims that Chandrababu intended to travel to London, contradicting statements made by CID officials. Luthra requested that the court compel the CID officials to provide call data records as evidence and contended that the CID had not adhered to the Anti-Corruption Act. He further argued that the Governor's approval was a prerequisite for Chandrababu's arrest. Inquiring about the existence of primary evidence implicating Chandrababu in the case, the judge
