Birthright Citizenship: 22 States Challenge Trump on Constitutional Grounds
Donald Trump, shortly after assuming office as President of the United States, issued several controversial executive orders. Among these, the most contentious was his decision to terminate "birthright citizenship." The move has sparked widespread opposition across the United States, with 22 states filing lawsuits within 24 hours of the order’s announcement, challenging its legality and constitutionality.
States including New York and California have strongly condemned Trump’s directive, arguing that it violates the U.S. Constitution. California Attorney General, commenting on the issue, stated, "The U.S. Constitution grants citizenship to anyone born on American soil. This fundamental right, enshrined in the 14th Amendment, ensures that birthright citizenship is a constitutional guarantee." He further alleged that Trump's decision exceeds his authority and is unconstitutional.
Constitutional experts have echoed similar views, emphasizing that altering birthright citizenship is not a straightforward process. They argued that it would require a constitutional amendment, which is extremely challenging, particularly given the current opposition from 22 states.
The legal battle has intensified, with many predicting prolonged court proceedings. Experts believe that this development not only tests Trump’s executive power but also raises significant questions about the interpretation and application of the 14th Amendment.
States including New York and California have strongly condemned Trump’s directive, arguing that it violates the U.S. Constitution. California Attorney General, commenting on the issue, stated, "The U.S. Constitution grants citizenship to anyone born on American soil. This fundamental right, enshrined in the 14th Amendment, ensures that birthright citizenship is a constitutional guarantee." He further alleged that Trump's decision exceeds his authority and is unconstitutional.
Constitutional experts have echoed similar views, emphasizing that altering birthright citizenship is not a straightforward process. They argued that it would require a constitutional amendment, which is extremely challenging, particularly given the current opposition from 22 states.
The legal battle has intensified, with many predicting prolonged court proceedings. Experts believe that this development not only tests Trump’s executive power but also raises significant questions about the interpretation and application of the 14th Amendment.